Services // AWS DevOps Consulting
Shipping code shouldn't require holding your breath.
I work as an AWS DevOps consultant out of Delhi NCR, fixing the gap between "we have a CI/CD pipeline" and "our CI/CD pipeline is actually something we trust." Terraform instead of console clicks, tests that run before merge instead of after production breaks, monitoring that says something useful instead of just existing.
If your team can already ship confidently, this page probably isn't for you. If deploys still feel like an event, it is.
Start with a pipeline review →What this actually covers
The tooling and process layer, not the architecture underneath it
CI/CD Pipelines
Getting code from a merged pull request to production without a human running commands by hand at the end. GitHub Actions, CodePipeline, whatever fits your stack the goal is a pipeline your team trusts enough to actually use.
Infrastructure as Code
Terraform, mostly, sometimes CDK depending on the team. If your infrastructure currently lives in someone's memory of what they clicked in the console three years ago, this is the fix and it's the part that pays off most when someone new joins the team.
Containers on ECS / EKS
Moving from EC2 instances running one app each to something that actually scales the way you meant it to. I'm honest about when Kubernetes is overkill for your team size ECS Fargate handles a lot of workloads perfectly well without the operational overhead.
Monitoring & Observability
Dashboards and alerts that tell you something is wrong before a customer does, and logs that actually help when you're debugging at 11 PM instead of just generating noise nobody reads.
How people usually bring me in
Scoped after I've seen how deploys actually work today
DevOps Maturity Review
A look at how code actually gets deployed today, where manual steps still exist, and what breaks the build most often. You get a prioritized list, not a lecture about best practices.
Pipeline & IaC Implementation
I build the pipeline and write the Terraform myself, working alongside your engineers rather than handing over a black box they can't maintain after I leave.
Ongoing DevOps Support
A standing arrangement for teams that want an experienced hand on tooling decisions without hiring a full-time DevOps engineer yet.
How the work actually happens
Built against real code, not a demo
See how deploys actually happen today
Not what the documentation says what someone actually types into a terminal when it's time to ship. That gap is usually where the real problems live.
Pick the smallest fix that removes the biggest risk
Sometimes that's automated tests before merge, sometimes it's just getting infrastructure out of ClickOps and into version control first.
Build it against a real branch, not a demo
Pipelines and IaC modules get tested against actual code and actual infrastructure changes, not a toy example that falls apart on day one.
Hand it off with documentation your team will read
Short, practical runbooks not a wiki page that gets written once and never opened again.
Questions people actually ask
Before the discovery call
What's the difference between DevOps consulting and cloud consulting?
DevOps consulting is specifically about the tooling and process layer how code ships, how infrastructure is defined, how you find out something's broken. Cloud consulting is the broader umbrella that also covers architecture, cost, and high availability. A lot of clients start here because a bad deploy process is often the most painful problem day to day, even when the underlying architecture is fine.
Do you set up CI/CD from scratch, or just fix an existing pipeline?
Both, depending on where you're starting from. A lot of "fixing" work is actually removing steps overcomplicated pipelines that nobody fully understands anymore tend to need simplifying as much as new ones need building.
Should we be using Kubernetes?
Often, no not yet, anyway. EKS makes sense once you've got the team and the workload complexity to justify it. For a lot of teams, ECS on Fargate gets the same practical benefits no server management, easy scaling without the operational learning curve. I'll tell you honestly if Kubernetes is solving a problem you don't actually have.
Do you write Terraform, or just advise on it?
I write it. If the goal is infrastructure your team can actually read and modify later, I'd rather build the first version properly than hand over a rough spec and hope it gets implemented the way it was intended.
We already have some CI/CD in place. Is this still relevant?
Usually, yes most pipelines I'm brought in on already exist, they're just missing something specific: no rollback step, tests that get skipped under deadline pressure, a deploy that only one person on the team knows how to run manually if it fails.
How is this different from the zero-downtime deployment work you also do?
Zero-downtime deployment is one specific outcome the release strategy itself (blue-green, canary). DevOps consulting is the broader pipeline and tooling around it: how code gets tested, built, and shipped in the first place. They often go together, but you can have solid CI/CD without zero-downtime releases, and vice versa.
See what's actually slowing your deploys down.
Most pipeline reviews turn up a fix that's smaller than expected and one that's been ignored for longer than anyone wants to admit.
Get in touch →